Send to

Choose Destination
See comment in PubMed Commons below
Eur Respir J. 2007 Jan;29(1):11-7.

The human lung: did evolution get it wrong?

Author information

UCSD Dept of Medicine 0623A, 9500 Gilman Drive, La Jolla, CA 92093-0623, USA.

Erratum in

  • Eur Respir J. 2007 Apr;29(4):823.


Some 300 million yrs ago, the ancestors of modern reptiles emerged from water and were committed to air breathing. They were exothermic and incapable of sustained levels of high physical activity. But from them evolved the two great classes of vertebrates with high levels of maximal oxygen consumption: the mammals and birds. A remarkable feature of these two divergent evolutionary lines is that, although the physiology of many organ systems shows many similarities, the lungs are radically different. A major difference is that the ventilation of the gas-exchanging tissue has a flow-through pattern in the bird but is reciprocating in the mammal. The result is that mammals have a reduced alveolar and arterial oxygen tension, a potential for uneven ventilation, and relatively large terminal air spaces. This in turn means that the pulmonary capillaries are poorly supported compared with the bird. The result is that the pulmonary capillaries in the bird have much thinner and more uniform walls, with more efficient gas exchange. Other advantages of the bird lung are that it utilises a more efficient cross-current pattern of gas-exchange, and the bird has separated the ventilatory and gas exchange functions. From a structure-function standpoint, the bird lung is superior.

[Indexed for MEDLINE]
Free full text
PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

How to join PubMed Commons

    Supplemental Content

    Full text links

    Icon for HighWire
    Loading ...
    Support Center