Format

Send to

Choose Destination
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2006 Dec;91(6):1138-51.

Higher-order factors of the Big Five in a multi-informant sample.

Author information

1
Department of Psychology, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06520, USA. cdeyoung@post.harvard.edu

Abstract

In a large community sample (N=490), the Big Five were not orthogonal when modeled as latent variables representing the shared variance of reports from 4 different informants. Additionally, the standard higher-order factor structure was present in latent space: Neuroticism (reversed), Agreeableness, and Conscientiousness formed one factor, labeled Stability, and Extraversion and Openness/Intellect formed a second factor, labeled Plasticity. Comparison of two instruments, the Big Five Inventory and the Mini-Markers, supported the hypotheses that single-adjective rating instruments are likely to yield lower interrater agreement than phrase rating instruments and that lower interrater agreement is associated with weaker correlations among the Big Five and a less coherent higher-order factor structure. In conclusion, an interpretation of the higher-order factors is discussed, including possible neurobiological substrates.

PMID:
17144770
DOI:
10.1037/0022-3514.91.6.1138
[Indexed for MEDLINE]

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for American Psychological Association
Loading ...
Support Center