Send to

Choose Destination
See comment in PubMed Commons below
BJOG. 2007 Jan;114(1):70-80. Epub 2006 Oct 26.

Precancerous changes in the cervix and risk of subsequent preterm birth.

Author information

Mother and Child Health Research, Faculty of Health Sciences, La Trobe University, Carlton, Victoria, Australia.



The aims of this study were (i) to examine whether women referred for assessment of precancerous changes in the cervix had higher rates of preterm birth compared with those in the general population and (ii) to compare preterm birth rates for treated and untreated women adjusting for possible confounding factors.


Retrospective cohort design.


Teaching hospital.


All women referred to the Royal Women's Hospital, Melbourne (1982-2000), who subsequently had a birth recorded on the Victorian Perinatal Data Collection system (n = 5548).


Record linkage of hospital dysplasia clinic records and population-based birth records.


Total preterm delivery (<37 weeks of gestation) and subtypes.


Both treated and untreated women were at a significantly increased risk for preterm birth compared with those in the general population: treated--standardised prevalence ratio (SPR) 2.0, 95% CI 1.8-2.3 and untreated--SPR 1.5, 95% CI 1.4-1.7. Within the cohort, the treated women were significantly more likely to give birth preterm (adjusted OR 1.23, 95% CI 1.01-1.51). An increased risk of preterm birth was also associated with a history of induced or spontaneous abortions, illicit drug use during pregnancy or a major maternal medical condition. Cone biopsy, loop electrosurgical excision procedure and diathermy were associated with preterm birth. After adjusting for possible confounding factors, only diathermy remained significant (adjusted OR 1.72, 95% CI 1.36-2.17). Women treated using laser ablation were not at an increased risk for preterm birth (adjusted OR 1.1, 95% CI 0.8-1.4).


Diagnosis of precancerous changes in the cervix (regardless of the treatment) was associated with an increased risk of preterm birth. Consideration should be given to the preferential use of ablative treatments.

[Indexed for MEDLINE]
Free full text
PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

How to join PubMed Commons

    Supplemental Content

    Full text links

    Icon for Wiley
    Loading ...
    Support Center