Format

Send to

Choose Destination
Am J Public Health. 2006 Nov;96(11):1914-9. Epub 2006 Oct 3.

"It's like Tuskegee in reverse": a case study of ethical tensions in institutional review board review of community-based participatory research.

Author information

1
Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, School of Nursing, University of California, San Francisco, CA 94143-0612, USA. ruth.malone@ucsf.edu

Abstract

Community-based participatory research (CBPR) addresses the social justice dimensions of health disparities by engaging marginalized communities, building capacity for action, and encouraging more egalitarian relationships between researchers and communities. CBPR may challenge institutionalized academic practices and the understandings that inform institutional review board deliberations and, indirectly, prioritize particular kinds of research. We present our attempt to study, as part of a CBPR partnership, cigarette sales practices in an inner-city community. We use critical and communitarian perspectives to examine the implications of the refusal of the university institutional review board (in this case, the University of California, San Francisco) to approve the study. CBPR requires expanding ethical discourse beyond the procedural, principle-based approaches common in biomedical research settings. The current ethics culture of academia may sometimes serve to protect institutional power at the expense of community empowerment.

PMID:
17018816
PMCID:
PMC1751809
DOI:
10.2105/AJPH.2005.082172
[Indexed for MEDLINE]
Free PMC Article

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for Atypon Icon for PubMed Central
Loading ...
Support Center