Format

Send to

Choose Destination
See comment in PubMed Commons below
J Appl Psychol. 2006 Sep;91(5):1114-24.

A meta-analytic evaluation of the impact of dimension and exercise factors on assessment center ratings.

Author information

1
Industrial/Organizational Psychology Program, Department of Management, The University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN, USA.

Abstract

Two recent reviews have attempted to summarize findings quantitatively regarding assessment center (AC) construct-related validity (i.e., Lance, Lambert, Gewin, Lievens, & Conway, 2004; Lievens & Conway, 2001). Unlike these previous studies, which reanalyzed individual multitrait-multimethod (MTMM) matrices from previously published research, the authors recoded and combined past matrices into a single MTMM matrix. This matrix, comprised of 6 dimensions each measured by 6 exercises, was then analyzed, providing a more generalizable set of results. Both dimensions and exercises were found to contribute substantially to AC ratings. Specific dimensions (i.e., communication, influencing others, organizing and planning, and problem solving) appeared more construct valid than others (i.e., consideration/awareness of others and drive). Implications for AC design and practice are discussed.

PMID:
16953772
DOI:
10.1037/0021-9010.91.5.1114
[Indexed for MEDLINE]
PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

0 comments
How to join PubMed Commons

    Supplemental Content

    Full text links

    Icon for American Psychological Association
    Loading ...
    Support Center