Format

Send to

Choose Destination
Theor Med Bioeth. 2006;27(4):357-73.

Moral agency in other animals.

Author information

1
The Humane Society of the United States, 700 Professional Dr, Gaithersburg, MD 20879, USA. pshapiro@hsus.org

Abstract

Some philosophers have argued that moral agency is characteristic of humans alone and that its absence from other animals justifies granting higher moral status to humans. However, human beings do not have a monopoly on moral agency, which admits of varying degrees and does not require mastery of moral principles. The view that all and only humans possess moral agency indicates our underestimation of the mental lives of other animals. Since many other animals are moral agents (to varying degrees), they are also subject to (limited) moral obligations, examples of which are provided in this paper. But, while moral agency is sufficient for significant moral status, it is by no means necessary.

PMID:
16906349
DOI:
10.1007/s11017-006-9010-0
[Indexed for MEDLINE]

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for Springer
Loading ...
Support Center