Format

Send to

Choose Destination
See comment in PubMed Commons below
Cogn Psychol. 2006 Nov;53(3):195-237. Epub 2006 Aug 4.

Modeling response signal and response time data.

Author information

1
Department of Psychology, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210, USA. ratcliff.22@osu.edu

Abstract

The diffusion model (Ratcliff, 1978) and the leaky competing accumulator model (LCA, Usher & McClelland, 2001) were tested against two-choice data collected from the same subjects with the standard response time procedure and the response signal procedure. In the response signal procedure, a stimulus is presented and then, at one of a number of experimenter-determined times, a signal to respond is presented. The models were fit to the data from the two procedures simultaneously under the assumption that responses in the response signal procedure were based on a mixture of decision processes that had already terminated at response boundaries before the signal and decision processes that had not yet terminated. In the latter case, decisions were based on partial information in one variant of each model or on guessing in a second variant. Both variants of the diffusion model fit the data well and both fit better than either variant of the LCA model, although the differences in numerical goodness-of-fit measures were not large enough to allow decisive selection between the models.

PMID:
16890214
PMCID:
PMC2397556
DOI:
10.1016/j.cogpsych.2005.10.002
[Indexed for MEDLINE]
PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

0 comments
How to join PubMed Commons

    Supplemental Content

    Full text links

    Icon for Elsevier Science Icon for PubMed Central
    Loading ...
    Support Center