Format

Send to

Choose Destination
See comment in PubMed Commons below
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2006 Jul;7(6):366-76. Epub 2006 Apr 25.

Systematic review of studies of staffing and quality in nursing homes.

Author information

1
University of Missouri-Columbia, Columbia, MO 65211, USA. bostickj@missouri.edu

Abstract

PURPOSE:

To evaluate a range of staffing measures and data sources for long-term use in public reporting of staffing as a quality measure in nursing homes.

METHOD:

Eighty-seven research articles and government documents published from 1975 to 2003 were reviewed and summarized. Relevant content was extracted and organized around 3 themes: staffing measures, quality measures, and risk adjustment variables. Data sources for staffing information were also identified.

RESULTS:

There is a proven association between higher total staffing levels (especially licensed staff) and improved quality of care. Studies also indicate a significant relationship between high turnover and poor resident outcomes. Functional ability, pressure ulcers, and weight loss are the most sensitive quality indicators linked to staffing. The best national data sources for staffing and quality include the Minimum Data Set (MDS) and On-line Survey and Certification Automated Records (OSCAR). However, the accuracy of this self-reported information requires further reliability and validity testing.

CONCLUSIONS:

A nationwide instrument needs to be developed to accurately measure staff turnover. Large-scale studies using payroll data to measure staff retention and its impact on resident outcomes are recommended. Future research should use the most nurse-sensitive quality indicators such as pressure ulcers, functional status, and weight loss.

PMID:
16843237
DOI:
10.1016/j.jamda.2006.01.024
[Indexed for MEDLINE]
PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

0 comments
How to join PubMed Commons

    Supplemental Content

    Full text links

    Icon for Elsevier Science
    Loading ...
    Support Center