Format

Send to

Choose Destination
See comment in PubMed Commons below
Addict Behav. 2007 Jan;32(1):148-57. Epub 2006 Jun 30.

Demographic differences in support for smoking policy interventions.

Author information

1
Cancer Prevention Research Center, 2 Chafee Road, University of Rhode Island, Kingston, RI 02881-0808, USA. jdoucet@mail.uri.edu

Abstract

The Smoking Policy Inventory (SPI) is a 35-item scale, which measures attitudes towards tobacco control policies. The five dimensions of the SPI are advertising and promotion, public education, laws and penalties, taxes and fees, and restrictions on smoking. The SPI has been applied to different samples, both in the USA and internationally. However, no one has investigated if there is differential support for policy intervention among subgroups within the USA. This study investigated subgroup differences on five demographic variables (gender, age, race, ethnicity, and education) across the five dimensions of the SPI. A random digit dial sample of 506 adult participants from the United States was analyzed with five MANOVAs and follow-up ANOVAs. Men (N=188) had significantly (p<0.05) less favorable attitudes towards tobacco control policies than women (N=317) on all five scales. Blacks (N=52) had significantly (p<0.05) more favorable attitudes than whites (N=410) on increasing public education. There were no significant differences between Hispanics (N=21) and non-Hispanics (N=469). Older people were significantly (p<0.05) more supportive of restrictions on advertising and promotion, increasing public education, and increasing environmental restrictions. More educated people were significantly (p<0.05) more supportive of increasing taxes and fees and increasing environmental restrictions. These subgroup differences could be employed to guide the targeting of changes in policies and interventions to the specific concerns of the various groups.

PMID:
16814475
DOI:
10.1016/j.addbeh.2006.04.003
[Indexed for MEDLINE]
PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

0 comments

    Supplemental Content

    Full text links

    Icon for Elsevier Science
    Loading ...
    Support Center