Format

Send to

Choose Destination
J Homosex. 2006;50(2-3):133-66.

Understanding sadomasochism: an empirical examination of four perspectives.

Author information

1
Carleton University, Ottawa, ON, Canada. patriciacross@hotmail.com

Abstract

Three studies assessed current understandings of sadomasochism (SM). In Study 1 questionnaires testing four academic views of SM were administered to individuals who self-defined as involved in SM. The psychoanalytic, psychopathology/medical model, radical feminist and escape-from-self perspectives were not supported. Study 2 examined "virtual" sadomasochism as a source of information about sadomasochists in the real life world. Cluster analyses indicated that real-life and virtual sadomasochists share unique sexual proclivities. Study 3 examined an alternative view that identifies power as the commodity of importance in SM play. Content analysis of online SM encounters indicated that both "top" and "bottom" role-players used several specific techniques to create a power differential. These studies suggest that, contrary to many academic theories, power, and not the giving and receiving of pain, is at the core of SM.

PMID:
16803762
DOI:
10.1300/J082v50n02_07
[Indexed for MEDLINE]

Supplemental Content

Loading ...
Support Center