Format

Send to

Choose Destination
See comment in PubMed Commons below
Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2006 Jul;85(7):593-9.

Magnetic stimulation of the quadriceps femoris muscle: comparison of pain with electrical stimulation.

Author information

  • 1Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE:

The objective of this study was to compare pain induced by magnetic stimulation of the quadriceps femoris (QF) muscle with that induced by transcutaneous neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES).

DESIGN:

Magnetic stimulation and transcutaneous NMES were applied to QF muscles of 17 normal volunteers. The intensity of each mode of stimulation was increased in a stepwise manner. Peak torque values of isometric contractions of QF muscles and visual analog scale (VAS) scores were recorded at each intensity level. The VAS scores of the two stimulating modalities were compared at the intensity-generating same peak torque values.

RESULTS:

The median VAS scores for electrical and magnetic stimulation were 5.7 and 0.3, respectively. The median difference between the VAS scores for electrical and magnetic stimulation was 3.7 (range, 1.7-8.5). The mean of the maximum peak torque obtained from each subject was higher in magnetic stimulation than in electrical stimulation (9.5 +/- 4.8 vs. 4.4 +/- 2.9 Nm).

CONCLUSIONS:

Magnetic stimulation of the QF muscle produced less pain at the same level of isometric peak torque than did transcutaneous NMES. Magnetic stimulation is a potential alternative to transcutaneous NMES, especially for persons with intact or residual sensory function.

[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

0 comments
How to join PubMed Commons

    Supplemental Content

    Full text links

    Icon for Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
    Loading ...
    Support Center