Format

Send to

Choose Destination
Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2006 May;32(5):253-60.

Evidence-based practice to reduce central line infections.

Author information

1
VA Inpatient Evaluation Center, Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Cincinnati, USA. marta.render@med.va.gov

Abstract

BACKGROUND:

In 2003, through the Greater Cincinnati Health Council nine health care systems agreed to participate and fund 50% of a two-year project to reduce hospital-acquired infections among patients in intensive care units (ICU) and following surgery (SIP).

METHODS:

Hospitals were randomized to either the CR-BSI or SIP project in the first year, adding the alternative project in year 2. Project leaders, often the infection control professionals, implemented evidence-based practices to reduce catheter-related blood stream infections (CR-BSIs; maximal sterile barriers, chlorhexidine) at their hospitals using a collaborative approach. Team leaders entered process information in a secure deidentifled Web-based database.

RESULTS:

Of the four initial sites randomized to CR-BSI reduction, all reduced central line infections by 50% (CR-BSI, 1.7 to 0.4/1000 line days, p < .05). At the project midpoint (3 quarters of 2004), adherence to evidence-based practices increased from 30% to nearly 95%.

DISCUSSION:

The direct role of hospital leadership and development of a local community of practice, facilitated cooperation of physicians, problem solving, and success. Use of forcing functions (removal of betadine in kits, creation of an accessory pack and a checklist for line insertion) improved reliability. The appropriate floor for central line infections in ICUs is < 1 infection /1,000 line days.

PMID:
16761789
[Indexed for MEDLINE]

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for Elsevier Science
Loading ...
Support Center