Format

Send to

Choose Destination
See comment in PubMed Commons below
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2006 Feb;160(2):164-70.

Simulating cost-effectiveness of fluoride varnish during well-child visits for Medicaid-enrolled children.

Author information

1
Department of Pediatric Dentistry, School of Dentistry, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA. quinoner@dentistry.unc.edu

Abstract

OBJECTIVE:

To examine the cost-effectiveness of fluoride varnish application by medical providers when implemented within a well-child periodicity schedule for Medicaid-enrolled children.

DESIGN:

Cost-effectiveness was analyzed using published probabilities and costs. Input parameters included the effectiveness of fluoride varnish (35.4%) applied according to the well-child periodicity schedule up to 3 years of age at $16.00 per application, annual caries increment (14%), age-specific dental care usage rates (0.2% at 9 months to 19% at 42 months), and age-related nonhospital treatment costs ($292.00-$503.00) and hospital treatment costs ($2191.00-$2940.00). Sensitivity analysis was conducted to assess the effects for varying input parameters.

SETTING:

Well-child visits during primary care.

PARTICIPANTS:

Children aged 9 to 42 months.

INTERVENTION:

Application of universal fluoride varnish (fluoride varnish-all) at 9, 18, 24, and 36 months vs no intervention (fluoride varnish-none) was compared.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES:

Cost per month without cavities and treatment averted during the first 42 months of life from a Medicaid payer's perspective.

RESULTS:

Fluoride varnish improved clinical outcomes by 1.52 cavity-free months but at a cost of $7.18 for each cavity-free month gained per child and $203 for each treatment averted. Considerable uncertainty existed for some parameters. Fluoride varnish was cost saving when dental services and nonhospital treatment costs were 1.5 to 2 times greater, respectively, than our base case estimate.

CONCLUSIONS:

Based on these assumptions, fluoride varnish use in the medical setting is effective in reducing early childhood caries in low-income populations but is not cost saving in the first 42 months of life. Potential total cost reductions with varying parameters suggest that evaluations using a longitudinal cohort are needed.

PMID:
16461872
DOI:
10.1001/archpedi.160.2.164
[Indexed for MEDLINE]
PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

0 comments

    Supplemental Content

    Full text links

    Icon for Silverchair Information Systems
    Loading ...
    Support Center