Format

Send to

Choose Destination
See comment in PubMed Commons below
J Assist Reprod Genet. 2006 Jan;23(1):33-6.

Can dissenting findings regarding the comparative effectiveness of ICSI and IVF be explained by a learning curve?

Author information

1
Health Technology Assessment, Institute of Health Services Research, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia. duncan.mortimer@buseco.monash.edu.au

Abstract

PURPOSE:

To determine whether between-trial heterogeneity in relative risk of fertilisation for intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) compared to in vitro fertilisation (IVF) can be explained by learning or by between-trial variation in patient characteristics.

METHODS:

Systematic review and meta-analysis of trials comparing fertilisation outcomes for ICSI and IVF (without surgical sperm retrieval). Meta-regressions to identify associations between treatment effect and trial characteristics.

RESULTS:

Coefficients on individually significant covariates from the meta-regressions confirm that the ICSI versus IVF treatment effect is increased when patients are "unsuited for IVF" but reduced as semen quality improves and when IVF insemination concentrations are increased. However, the relative risk of fertilisation varies inversely with publication date; contrary to the hypothesised learning effect.

CONCLUSION:

While it is recognised that publication date might proxy for unobserved covariates, the possibility of a learning effect in favour of ICSI is not supported by the meta-regression.

PMID:
16429320
PMCID:
PMC3455433
DOI:
10.1007/s10815-005-9004-2
[Indexed for MEDLINE]
Free PMC Article
PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

0 comments
How to join PubMed Commons

    Supplemental Content

    Full text links

    Icon for Springer Icon for PubMed Central
    Loading ...
    Support Center