Format

Send to

Choose Destination
See comment in PubMed Commons below
J Clin Psychol. 2006 Feb;62(2):243-51.

The case against no-suicide contracts: the commitment to treatment statement as a practice alternative.

Author information

1
Department of Psychology & Neuroscience, Baylor University, TX 97334, USA. M_Rud@baylor.edu

Abstract

This article reviews the literature on the use of "no-suicide contracts" in clinical practice, including conceptual discussions, patient and clinician surveys, and a few empirical studies on clinical utility. Our primary conclusion is that no-suicide contracts suffer from a broad range of conceptual, practical, and empirical problems. Most significantly, they have no empirical support for their effectiveness in the clinical environment. The authors provide and illustrate the commitment to treatment statement as a practice alternative to the no-suicide contract.

PMID:
16342293
DOI:
10.1002/jclp.20227
[Indexed for MEDLINE]
PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

0 comments
How to join PubMed Commons

    Supplemental Content

    Full text links

    Icon for Wiley
    Loading ...
    Support Center