Format

Send to

Choose Destination
See comment in PubMed Commons below
Sex Health. 2005;2(3):185-92.

Do the characteristics of sexual health centre clients predict chlamydia infection sufficiently strongly to allow selective screening?

Author information

1
Macfarlane Burnet Institute for Medical Research and Public Health, Melbourne, Australia. hocking@burnet.edu.au

Abstract

OBJECTIVES:

This study aimed to estimate chlamydia prevalence and risk factors for infection and to assess the performance of chlamydia-selective screening criteria among clients attending a large sexually transmitted infection (STI) clinic.

METHODS:

Computerised records for all attendances between 1 July 2002 and 30 June 2003 were analysed. Chlamydia prevalence and risk factors for infection were determined for all new clients. The sensitivity and specificity of risk factors for chlamydia were assessed.

RESULTS:

2642 male and 2084 female new clients were tested for chlamydia with a prevalence of 7.3% (95% CI: 6.3%, 8.4%) among men and 3.9% (95% CI: 3.1%, 4.9%) among women. Screening heterosexual men based on a positive contact or symptoms of non-specific urethritis or any two of age <25 years, 4+ partners last 12 months, inconsistent condom use or not presenting for an asymptomatic screen detected 88% of infections by screening 62%. Screening women based on a positive contact or injecting drug use or any two of age <25 years, 2+ partners last 12 months or inconsistent condom use would detect 86% of infections by screening 57%.

CONCLUSIONS:

Selective screening could be used to more efficiently identify heterosexual men and women at risk of chlamydia.

PMID:
16335546
[Indexed for MEDLINE]
PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

0 comments
How to join PubMed Commons

    Supplemental Content

    Loading ...
    Support Center