Format

Send to

Choose Destination
See comment in PubMed Commons below
Crit Care Med. 2005 Nov;33(11):2534-9.

Pre-ejection period variations predict the fluid responsiveness of septic ventilated patients.

Author information

1
Intensive Care Unit, Centre Hospitalier, Belfort, France.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES:

In septic patients with acute circulatory failure, reliable predictors of fluid responsiveness are needed at the bedside. We hypothesized that the respiratory change in pre-ejection period (DeltaPEP) would allow the prediction of changes in cardiac index following volume administration in mechanically ventilated septic patients.

DESIGN:

Prospective clinical investigation.

SETTING:

A ten-bed hospital intensive care unit.

PATIENTS:

Patients admitted after septic shock equipped with an arterial catheter.

INTERVENTIONS:

Pre-ejection period (PEP)--defined as the time interval between the beginning of the R wave on the electrocardiogram and the upstroke of the radial arterial pressure curve (PEPKT) or the pulse plethysmographic waveforms (PEPPLET)--and cardiac index (transthoracic echocardiography-Doppler) were determined before and after volume infusion of colloid (8 mL x kg). DeltaPEP (%) was defined as the difference between expiratory and inspiratory PEP divided by the mean of expiratory and inspiratory values. Respiratory changes in pulse pressure (DeltaPP) was also measured.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS:

: Twenty-two volume challenges were done in 20 deeply sedated patients. DeltaPEPKT, DeltaPEPPLET, and DeltaPP (measured in all patients) before volume expansion were correlated with cardiac index change after fluid challenge (r = .73, r = .67, and r = .70, respectively, p < .0001). Patients with a cardiac index increase induced by volume expansion > or = 15% and <15% were classified as responders and nonresponders, respectively. Receiver operating characteristic curves showed that the threshold DeltaPP value of 17% allowed discrimination between responder/nonresponder patients with a sensitivity of 85% and a specificity of 100%. For both DeltaPEPKT and DeltaPEPPLET, the best threshold value was 4% with a sensitivity-specificity of 92%-89% and 100%-67%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS:

The present study found DeltaPEPKT and DeltaPEPPLET to be as accurate as DeltaPP in the prediction of fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated septic patients.

PMID:
16276164
[Indexed for MEDLINE]
PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

0 comments
How to join PubMed Commons

    Supplemental Content

    Full text links

    Icon for Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
    Loading ...
    Support Center