Format

Send to

Choose Destination
Am J Public Health. 2005 Dec;95(12):2155-60. Epub 2005 Oct 27.

Stormy weather: race, gene expression, and the science of health disparities.

Author information

1
Department of Society, Human Development and Health, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, MA 02115, USA. nkrieger@hsph.harvard.edu

Abstract

In the current US political climate, conservative foundations are seeking to frame debates over determinants of racial/ethnic health disparities as a matter of "politically correct" unscientific ideology (concerning the health impacts of discrimination) vs scientific yet "politically incorrect" expertise rooted in biological facts (concerning genes). I draw on historical and contemporary examples to place conservative polemics in context, and also highlight fundamental flaws in their arguments involving the use of spurious categories (e.g., Caucasian), logical fallacies, temporal fallacies, and an erroneous emphasis on gene frequency over gene expression. The larger goal is to strengthen development of a more critical, reflexive, and rigorous science capable of generating evidence useful for rectifying--rather than perpetuating--social disparities in health.

PMID:
16257941
PMCID:
PMC1449500
DOI:
10.2105/AJPH.2005.067108
[Indexed for MEDLINE]
Free PMC Article

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for Atypon Icon for PubMed Central
Loading ...
Support Center