Format

Send to

Choose Destination
J Artif Organs. 2005;8(3):137-42.

Clinical benefits and risk analysis of topical hemostats: a review.

Author information

1
Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Tokyo Women's Medical University, 8-1 Kawada-cho, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo, 162-8666, Japan. 4CRNRY@hij.twmu.ac.jp

Abstract

A variety of local hemostats including absorbable gelatin sponge, collagen hemostat, and oxidized cellulose are commercially available. Local hemostats are applied when cautery, ligature, or other conventional hemostatic method is impractical. Proper handling is essential to control bleeding and only the required amount should be used, even though the hemostat is expected to dissolve promptly. A dry local hemostat absorbs body fluid of several times its own weight and expands postoperatively. Therefore, when an absorbable hemostatic agent is retained on or near bony or neural spaces, the minimum amount should be left after hemostasis is achieved. Documentation is important with regard to the hemostat used, including the name of the agent, site, and amount. This information is used as a reference in the interpretation of postoperative diagnostic images, since retained hemostat may sometimes mimic an abscess or recurrent tumor. The antigenicity of collagen is known to be low because of homology. When the safety of collagen was evaluated, the incidence of positive reactions was reported as 3.0%, and collagen may cause allergic reactions. Minimum inflammation without strong foreign body reactions or blockade of healing is desirable after the use of local hemostats. Strong foreign body reactions, chronic inflammation, and infections can cause granuloma formation after local hemostat use. By using local hemostats, it is possible to improve the condition of the patient, reduce complications, and lower direct and indirect costs.

PMID:
16235029
DOI:
10.1007/s10047-005-0296-x
[Indexed for MEDLINE]

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for Springer
Loading ...
Support Center