Format

Send to

Choose Destination
See comment in PubMed Commons below
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2006 Mar 1;125(1):109-13. Epub 2005 Sep 1.

Sublingual versus vaginal route of misoprostol for cervical ripening prior to surgical termination of first trimester abortions.

Author information

1
Department of Reproductive Biomedicine, National Institute of Health and Family Welfare, New Mehrauli Road, Munirka, New Delhi 110067, India. pikeesaxena@hotmail.com

Abstract

BACKGROUND:

Sublingual and vaginal routes of misoprostol have been found to be effective for pharmacological ripening prior to surgical termination of first trimester abortions. We conducted this study to compare the effectiveness and acceptability of sublingual versus vaginal route of misoprostol for cervical priming prior to vacuum aspiration (VA).

METHODS:

In this prospective clinical trial, a total of 100 women with period of gestation between 6 and 12 weeks scheduled for day surgery abortion were sequentially allocated into two groups of 50 each. All participating women received 400 microg of misoprostol 3 h prior to VA either by sublingual (self-administered at home) or by vaginal route (inserted by the doctor in hospital) after wetting the tablet with water.

RESULTS:

Demographic characteristics of both the groups were comparable. For all periods of gestation, sublingual misoprostol significantly improved cervical dilatation (p<0.001) and reduced the time duration of surgery (p<0.001) compared to vaginal group without increasing the side effects. Mean pain score of the sublingual group was 2.7+/-1.1 as compared to 3.2+/-1.6 of the vaginal group (p=0.57). Misoprostol tablet was found intact in the vagina of three patients and was only partially absorbed amongst five patients at the time of VA.

CONCLUSION:

Sublingual route is an effective and convenient alternative to vaginal administration of misoprostol for cervical dilatation. It can be conveniently self-administered at home thereby decreasing hospital stay and cost. It also has a good patient acceptability rate.

PMID:
16139942
DOI:
10.1016/j.ejogrb.2005.07.022
[Indexed for MEDLINE]
PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

0 comments
How to join PubMed Commons

    Supplemental Content

    Full text links

    Icon for Elsevier Science
    Loading ...
    Support Center