Background: Staff in Swedish child health care today feel a gap between policy and practice. By revealing the main lines in the development of child health care, we hoped to achieve a better understanding of the current trends and problems in today's Swedish child health care.
Methods: A selection of official documents about the development of child health care during the period 1930-2000 was studied with the aid of discourse analysis.
Results: Four discourses were identified, which serve as a foundation for a periodization of the development of child health care. In the first period the main task of child health care, alongside checking on the development of the child, was to inform and educate the mothers. During the second period health supervision became the crucial task, to identify risks and discover abnormalities and disabilities. The third period focused on the discussion concerning the identification of health-related and social 'risk groups', and the work of child health care was increasingly geared to supervision of the parents' care of their children. Parents were to be given support so that they could cope with their difficulties by themselves. During the current period child health care is increasingly expected to direct its work towards the child's surroundings and the family as a whole and is now explicitly defined as an institution that should strengthen parents' self-esteem and competence. The level of responsibility for the child's health changed gradually during the different periods, from public responsibility to parental responsibility. The focus of efforts in child health care was changed from being general in the first and second periods to general and selective in period three, and then gradually becoming selective again in period four. While control of the child's physical health was central during the first two periods, psychosocial health came into focus in the last two, along with the importance of supporting the parents to enable them to handle their difficulties by themselves.
Concluding remarks: We noted that it was difficult to translate policy recommendations into practice. One reason was the shifting focus in child health care from the child's physical health to psychosocial problems which in itself meant a shift from descriptions of concrete and well-defined duties to more abstract and general descriptions of tasks which are by definition open to interpretation. Another reason for the noted difficulty was the transition from unambiguously described measures in terms of paternalistic regulation to more participatory and at the same time more expansive definitions of roles and responsibilities.