Format

Send to

Choose Destination
Sex Transm Dis. 2005 Aug;32(8):474-83.

Costs and effects of chlamydial screening: dynamic versus static modeling.

Author information

1
Institute of Health Economics and Health Care Management, GSF-National Research Center for Environment and Health, Neuherberg, Germany. robi.welte@gsf.de

Abstract

OBJECTIVE:

The objective of this study was to assess the impact of modeling type on the economic evaluation of screening programs for asymptomatic Chlamydia trachomatis infections.

STUDY:

We compared a stochastic network simulation model (dynamic model) with a decision analysis model (static model) for estimating the cost-effectiveness of an opportunistic screening program. The influence of the model type on the required data, the computed results, and the sensitivity of model parameters were investigated.

RESULTS:

When compared with static modeling, dynamic modeling yielded different cost-effectiveness ratios and identified other optimal screening strategies as it considers changes in the force of infection caused by screening. However, it is more complex, data- and time-demanding, and more sensitive to some parameters affecting the force of infection than static modeling.

CONCLUSIONS:

Dynamic models should be applied for the economic evaluation of prevention measures that have the potential to lower the force of infection such as large-scale chlamydial screening programs.

[Indexed for MEDLINE]

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for Wolters Kluwer
Loading ...
Support Center