Format

Send to

Choose Destination
See comment in PubMed Commons below
Crit Care Med. 2005 Jul;33(7):1519-28.

Paradoxical responses to positive end-expiratory pressure in patients with airway obstruction during controlled ventilation.

Author information

1
Respiratory and Emergency Intensive Care Unit, Emergency Department, Hospital das Clínicas, University of São Paulo Medical School, Brazil.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE:

To reevaluate the clinical impact of external positive end-expiratory pressure (external-PEEP) application in patients with severe airway obstruction during controlled mechanical ventilation. The controversial occurrence of a paradoxic lung deflation promoted by PEEP was scrutinized.

DESIGN:

External-PEEP was applied stepwise (2 cm H(2)O, 5-min steps) from zero-PEEP to 150% of intrinsic-PEEP in patients already submitted to ventilatory settings minimizing overinflation. Two commonly used frequencies during permissive hypercapnia (6 and 9/min), combined with two different tidal volumes (VT: 6 and 9 mL/kg), were tested.

SETTING:

A hospital intensive care unit.

PATIENTS:

Eight patients were enrolled after confirmation of an obstructive lung disease (inspiratory resistance, >20 cm H(2)O/L per sec) and the presence of intrinsic-PEEP (> or =5 cm H(2)O) despite the use of very low minute ventilation.

INTERVENTIONS:

All patients were continuously monitored for intra-arterial blood gas values, cardiac output, lung mechanics, and lung volume with plethysmography.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS:

Three different responses to external-PEEP were observed, which were independent of ventilatory settings. In the biphasic response, isovolume-expiratory flows and lung volumes remained constant during progressive PEEP steps until a threshold, beyond which overinflation ensued. In the classic overinflation response, any increment of external-PEEP caused a decrease in isovolume-expiratory flows, with evident overinflation. In the paradoxic response, a drop in functional residual capacity during external-PEEP application (when compared to zero-external-PEEP) was commonly accompanied by decreased plateau pressures and total-PEEP, with increased isovolume-expiratory flows. The paradoxic response was observed in five of the eight patients (three with asthma and two with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease) during at least one ventilator pattern.

CONCLUSIONS:

External-PEEP application may relieve overinflation in selected patients with airway obstruction during controlled mechanical ventilation. No a priori information about disease, mechanics, or ventilatory settings was predictive of the response. An empirical PEEP trial investigating plateau pressure response in these patients appears to be a reasonable strategy with minimal side effects.

PMID:
16003057
PMCID:
PMC2287196
[Indexed for MEDLINE]
Free PMC Article
PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

0 comments
How to join PubMed Commons

    Supplemental Content

    Full text links

    Icon for Wolters Kluwer Icon for PubMed Central
    Loading ...
    Support Center