Format

Send to

Choose Destination
Br J Surg. 2005 Oct;92(10):1288-92.

Comparison of Surgical Risk Score, POSSUM and p-POSSUM in higher-risk surgical patients.

Author information

1
Department of Surgery, Watford General Hospital, Watford, UK.

Abstract

BACKGROUND:

Much current interest is focused on the use of the Physiological and Operative Severity Score for the enUmeration of Mortality and morbidity (POSSUM) and the Portsmouth predictor equation (p-POSSUM) for risk-adjusted surgical audit. The Surgical Risk Score (SRS) has been shown to offer an equivalent accuracy, but was validated using a cohort that contained a high proportion of low-risk patients. The aim of this study was to compare the accuracy of mortality prediction using SRS with that of POSSUM and p-POSSUM in a cohort of higher-risk patients.

METHODS:

Some 949 consecutive patients undergoing inpatient surgical procedures in a district general hospital under the care of a single surgeon were analysed.

RESULTS:

The observed 30-day mortality rate was 8.4 per cent. Mean mortality rates predicted using SRS, POSSUM and p-POSSUM scores were 5.9, 12.6 and 7.3 per cent respectively. No significant difference was observed in the area under the receiver-operator characteristic curves for the three methods.

CONCLUSION:

The SRS accurately predicted mortality in higher-risk surgical patients. The accuracy of prediction equalled that of POSSUM and p-POSSUM.

PMID:
15981213
DOI:
10.1002/bjs.5058
[Indexed for MEDLINE]

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for Wiley
Loading ...
Support Center