Support for an explanation of the guidance effect in motor skill learning

J Mot Behav. 2005 May;37(3):231-8. doi: 10.3200/JMBR.37.3.231-238.

Abstract

The authors investigated whether the knowledge of results (KR) schedule influences the extent to which intrinsic feedback is noticed and used. Fifty-six participants received KR that was either delayed over 2 trials (Delay-2) or provided directly after each trial (Delay-0) during 160 trials of an unfamiliar aiming task. No-KR retention tests were given after 80 trials and 1 min and 24 hr after the end of acquisition. After retention, all participants were questioned about their use of intrinsic feedback during practice and whether those sources changed as a function of practice. The Delay-2 group performed significantly less accurately on the 1st and last blocks of acquisition trials but showed a significantly smaller performance decline from acquisition to retention. Moreover, the Delay-2 group noticed and used a greater variety of intrinsic feedback sources and its members were more likely to report that their usage changed with practice.

Publication types

  • Research Support, U.S. Gov't, P.H.S.

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Feedback
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Knowledge of Results, Psychological*
  • Learning*
  • Male
  • Motor Skills*
  • Practice, Psychological
  • Psychomotor Performance
  • Retention, Psychology