Format

Send to

Choose Destination
Am J Public Health. 2005 May;95(5):844-50.

Disparities in indigenous health: a cross-country comparison between New Zealand and the United States.

Author information

1
Department of Health Policy, Mount Sinai Medical School, NY, USA. dale.bramley@waitematadhb.govt.nz <dale.bramley@waitematadhb.govt.nz>

Abstract

OBJECTIVES:

We compared the health statuses of the indigenous populations of New Zealand and the United States with those of the numerically dominant populations of these countries.

METHODS:

Health indicators compared included health outcome measures, preventive care measures, modifiable risk factor prevalence, and treatment measures.

RESULTS:

In the case of nearly every health status indicator assessed, disparities (both absolute and relative) were more pronounced for Maoris than for American Indians/Alaska Natives. Both indigenous populations suffered from disparities across a range of health indicators. However, no disparities were observed for American Indians/Alaska Natives in regard to immunization coverage.

CONCLUSIONS:

Ethnic health disparities appear to be more pronounced in New Zealand than in the United States. These disparities are not necessarily intractable. Although differences in national health sector responses exist, New Zealand may be well placed in the future to evaluate the effectiveness of new strategies to reduce these disparities given the extent and quality of Maori-specific health information available.

Comment in

PMID:
15855464
PMCID:
PMC1449267
DOI:
10.2105/AJPH.2004.040907
[Indexed for MEDLINE]
Free PMC Article

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for Atypon Icon for PubMed Central
Loading ...
Support Center