Format

Send to

Choose Destination
BMC Bioinformatics. 2005 Apr 15;6:99.

Improved profile HMM performance by assessment of critical algorithmic features in SAM and HMMER.

Author information

1
Center for Genomics and Bioinformatics, Karolinska Institutet, S-17177 Stockholm, Sweden. markus.wistrand@cgb.ki.se

Abstract

BACKGROUND:

Profile hidden Markov model (HMM) techniques are among the most powerful methods for protein homology detection. Yet, the critical features for successful modelling are not fully known. In the present work we approached this by using two of the most popular HMM packages: SAM and HMMER. The programs' abilities to build models and score sequences were compared on a SCOP/Pfam based test set. The comparison was done separately for local and global HMM scoring.

RESULTS:

Using default settings, SAM was overall more sensitive. SAM's model estimation was superior, while HMMER's model scoring was more accurate. Critical features for model building were then analysed by comparing the two packages' algorithmic choices and parameters. The weighting between prior probabilities and multiple alignment counts held the primary explanation why SAM's model building was superior. Our analysis suggests that HMMER gives too much weight to the sequence counts. SAM's emission prior probabilities were also shown to be more sensitive. The relative sequence weighting schemes are different in the two packages but performed equivalently.

CONCLUSION:

SAM model estimation was more sensitive, while HMMER model scoring was more accurate. By combining the best algorithmic features from both packages the accuracy was substantially improved compared to their default performance.

PMID:
15831105
PMCID:
PMC1097716
DOI:
10.1186/1471-2105-6-99
[Indexed for MEDLINE]
Free PMC Article

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for BioMed Central Icon for PubMed Central
Loading ...
Support Center