Jaw clenching modulates sensory perception in high- but not in low-hypnotizable subjects

J Orofac Pain. 2005 Winter;19(1):76-81.

Abstract

Aims: To investigate the effect of jaw clenching on the sensations evoked at segmental and nonsegmental levels by painful and nonpainful stimuli and in relation to hypnotic susceptibility.

Methods: The effect of jaw clenching on painful and nonpainful sensations on the face and leg was studied in high-hypnotizable (HH) and low-hypnotizable (LH) subjects. Sixteen healthy subjects were selected and assigned to either the HH group (n = 8) or the LH group (n = 8). Painful and nonpainful electrical stimuli were delivered in random order to the face and leg. The subjects rated the intensity of the evoked sensation on a visual analog scale (VAS) while clenching or not clenching their jaw.

Results: Jaw clenching significantly attenuated the VAS sensory ratings of all the subjects under various conditions (F(1-31) = 6.15, P < .02). When the HH and LH subjects were analyzed separately, jaw clenching was found to be effective in reducing sensations only in the HH subjects (F(1-15) = 8.30, P = .01), only those evoked in the face (segmental level), and only those evoked by nonpainful stimuli (tied Z = 2.52, tied P < .02).

Conclusion: Sensory modulation produced by jaw clenching may be related to hypnotic susceptibility. On the whole, jaw clenching had a weak, local effect in modulating sensation, in contrast to its known widespread effect on motor behavior.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Analysis of Variance
  • Bite Force*
  • Electric Stimulation
  • Face
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Hypnosis*
  • Leg
  • Male
  • Masticatory Muscles / physiology*
  • Muscle Contraction / physiology
  • Pain Measurement
  • Sensation / physiology*
  • Statistics, Nonparametric