Format

Send to

Choose Destination
See comment in PubMed Commons below
Br J Surg. 2005 May;92(5):637-42.

Penetrating missile injuries during asymmetric warfare in the 2003 Gulf conflict.

Author information

1
Department of Trauma and Orthopaedics, Nuffield Orthopaedic Centre, Headington, Oxford, UK. DEHinsley@aol.com <DEHinsley@aol.com>

Abstract

BACKGROUND:

War wounds produce a significant burden on medical facilities in wartime. Workload from the recent conflict was documented in order to guide future medical needs.

METHODS:

All data on war injuries were collected prospectively. This information was supplemented with a review of all patients admitted during the study period.

RESULTS:

During the first 2 weeks of the conflict, the sole British field hospital in the region received 482 casualties. One hundred and four were battle injuries of which nine were burns. Seventy-nine casualties had their initial surgery performed by British military surgeons and form the study group. Twenty-nine casualties (37 per cent) sustained gunshot wounds, 49 (62 per cent) suffered wounds from fragmentation weapons and one casualty detonated an antipersonnel mine. These 79 patients had a total of 123 wounds that were scored prospectively using the Red Cross Wound Classification. Twenty-seven (34 per cent) of the wounded were non-combatants; eight of these were children. Four patients (5 per cent) died.

CONCLUSION:

War is changing; modern conflicts appear likely to be fought in urban or remote environments, producing different wounding patterns and placing non-combatants in the line of fire. Military medical skills training and available resources must reflect these fundamental changes in preparation for future conflicts.

PMID:
15744703
DOI:
10.1002/bjs.4911
[Indexed for MEDLINE]
PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

0 comments
How to join PubMed Commons

    Supplemental Content

    Full text links

    Icon for Wiley
    Loading ...
    Support Center