Format

Send to

Choose Destination
Int J Eat Disord. 2005 Mar;37(2):92-9.

Assessment of patients with anorexia nervosa: interview versus self-report.

Author information

1
Eating Disorders Research Unit, NY State Psychiatric Institute--Unit 98, 1051 Riverside Drive, New York, NY 10032, USA.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE:

The current study compared the agreement between the Eating Disorders Examination (EDE) and the Eating Disorders Examination-Questionnaire (EDE-Q) in the diagnosis and assessment of eating disorder pathology in a sample of women with anorexia nervosa.

METHOD:

First, a physician administered a clinical interview to each patient. Then, before hospital admission, all subjects were given the EDE-Q and the EDE interview.

RESULTS:

Results indicate that agreement between the EDE and the EDE-Q on the individual items informing the overall diagnosis of anorexia nervosa ranges from low to moderate. Agreement for the overall diagnosis of anorexia nervosa and for the binge/purge subtype was more impressive. Although correlations between subscale scores as well as eating disorder behaviors were strong, higher levels of disturbance were consistently reported on the EDE-Q than on the EDE interview.

DISCUSSION:

The pattern of findings suggests that the EDE-Q may be used in place of the interviewer-based measure when assessing overall diagnosis and subtype, as well as specific, well-defined features (vomiting/laxative use). However, there was a low level of agreement with respect to less-defined features, like binge eating, for which significantly higher frequencies were generated by the self-report questionnaire.

PMID:
15732073
DOI:
10.1002/eat.20076
[Indexed for MEDLINE]

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for Wiley
Loading ...
Support Center