Format

Send to

Choose Destination
See comment in PubMed Commons below
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2005 Feb 16;97(4):307-9.

Signal in noise: evaluating reported reproducibility of serum proteomic tests for ovarian cancer.

Author information

1
Department of Biostatistics, M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA. kabagg@mdanderson.org

Abstract

Proteomic profiling of serum initially appeared to be dramatically effective for diagnosis of early-stage ovarian cancer, but these results have proven difficult to reproduce. A recent publication reported good classification in one dataset using results from training on a much earlier dataset, but the authors have since reported that they did not perform the analysis as described. We examined the reproducibility of the proteomic patterns across datasets in more detail. Our analysis reveals that the pattern that enabled successful classification is biologically implausible and that the method, properly applied, does not classify the data accurately. We show that the method used in previously published studies does not establish reproducibility and performs no better than chance for classifying the second dataset, in part because the second dataset is easy to classify correctly. We conclude that the reproducibility of the proteomic profiling approach has yet to be established.

PMID:
15713966
DOI:
10.1093/jnci/dji008
[Indexed for MEDLINE]
PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

0 comments
How to join PubMed Commons

    Supplemental Content

    Full text links

    Icon for Silverchair Information Systems
    Loading ...
    Support Center