Format

Send to

Choose Destination
See comment in PubMed Commons below
Mol Biol Evol. 2005 Apr;22(4):1129-36. Epub 2005 Feb 2.

Consideration of RNA secondary structure significantly improves likelihood-based estimates of phylogeny: examples from the bilateria.

Author information

  • 1Department of Biology, University College London, London, UK. m.telford@ucl.ac.uk

Abstract

Sequences from ribosomal RNA (rRNA) genes have made a huge contribution to our current understanding of metazoan phylogeny and indeed the phylogeny of all of life. That said, some parts of this rRNA-based phylogeny remain unresolved. One approach to increase the resolution of these trees would be to use more appropriate models of sequence evolution in phylogenetic analysis. RNAs transcribed from rRNA genes have a complex secondary structure mediated by base pairing between sometimes distant regions of the rRNA molecule. The pairing between the stem nucleotides has important consequences for their evolution which differs from that of unpaired loop nucleotides. These differences in evolution should ideally be accounted for when using rRNA sequences for phylogeny estimation. We use a novel permutation approach to demonstrate the significant superiority of models of sequence evolution that allow stem and loop regions to evolve according to separate models and, in common with previous studies, we show that 16-state models that take base pairing of stems into account are significantly better than simpler, 4-state, single-nucleotide models. One of these 16-state models has been applied to the phylogeny of the Bilateria using small subunit rRNA (SSU) sequences. Our optimal tree largely echoes previous results based on SSU in particular supporting the tripartite Bilaterian tree of deuterostomes, lophotrochozoans, and ecdysozoans. There are also a number of differences, however, perhaps most important of which is the observation of a clade consisting of the gastrotrichs plus platyheminthes that is basal to all other lophotrochozoan taxa. Use of 16-state models also appears to reduce the Bayesian support given to certain biologically improbable groups found using standard 4-state models.

PMID:
15689526
DOI:
10.1093/molbev/msi099
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Free full text
PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

0 comments
How to join PubMed Commons

    Supplemental Content

    Full text links

    Icon for HighWire
    Loading ...
    Support Center