Format

Send to

Choose Destination
Sleep Med. 2005 Jan;6(1):63-9. Epub 2005 Jan 12.

Use of the 'BEARS' sleep screening tool in a pediatric residents' continuity clinic: a pilot study.

Author information

1
Division of Pediatric Ambulatory Medicine, Brown University School of Medicine, Rhode Island Hospital, 593 Eddy St., Potter Building, Suite 200, Providence, RI 02903, USA. owensleep@aol.com

Abstract

OBJECTIVE:

To assess the effectiveness of a simple, 5-item pediatric sleep screening instrument, the BEARS (B=Bedtime Issues, E=Excessive Daytime Sleepiness, A=Night Awakenings, R=Regularity and Duration of Sleep, S=Snoring) in obtaining sleep-related information and identifying sleep problems in the primary care setting.

SETTING:

Pediatric residents' continuity clinic in a tertiary care children's hospital.

METHODS:

BEARS forms were placed in the medical records of a convenience sample of 2 to 12 year old children presenting for well child visits over the 5 month study period. Sleep-related information recorded in the BEARS visit and in the pre-BEARS visit, which was the subject's most recent previous well child check (WCC), was coded with respect to whether or not a sleep problem was indicated, and whether sleep issues were addressed.

RESULTS:

A total of 195 children had both a documented pre-BEARS and BEARS WCC visit. BEARS visits were significantly more likely than the pre-BEARS visits to have any sleep information recorded (98.5% vs. 87.7%, p<0.001), and to have information recorded about bedtime issues (93.3% vs. 7.7%, p<0.001), excessive daytime sleepiness (93.9% vs. 5.6%, p<0.001), snoring (92.8% vs. 7.2%, p<0.001), nighttime awakenings (91.3% vs. 29.2%, p<0.001), and regularity and duration of sleep (65.3% vs. 31.5%, p<0.001). Significantly more sleep problems were identified during the BEARS visits in the domains of bedtime issues (16.3% vs. 4.1%, p<0.001), nighttime awakenings (18.4% vs. 6.8%, p<0.001) and snoring (10.7% vs. 4.6%, p=0.012). Finally, almost twice as many BEARS charts had sleep mentioned in the Impression and Plan (13.1% vs. 7.3%), which approached significance (p=0.07).

CONCLUSIONS:

The BEARS appears to be a user-friendly pediatric sleep screening tool which significantly increases the amount of sleep information recorded as well as the likelihood of identifying sleep problems in the primary care setting.

PMID:
15680298
DOI:
10.1016/j.sleep.2004.07.015
[Indexed for MEDLINE]

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for Elsevier Science
Loading ...
Support Center