Format

Send to

Choose Destination
J Altern Complement Med. 2004 Dec;10(6):979-84.

n-of-1 randomized controlled trials: an opportunity for complementary and alternative medicine evaluation.

Author information

1
Complementary and Alternative Research and Education (CARE) Program, Department of Pediatrics, University of Alberta, Mackenzie Health Sciences Centre, Edmonton, Alberta T6G 2R7, Canada. b.johnston@ualberta.ca

Abstract

Complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) practice has traditionally relied on expert opinion and case examples to evaluate the outcome of a particular therapeutic treatment. Such trials are subject to bias, leading to the formation of erroneous conclusions about the effectiveness of most treatments. This paper reviews the feasibility of n-of-1 trials to better evaluate the clinical and statistical significance of CAM therapies. In particular: (1) problems arising from the use of standard therapeutic trials; (2) the n-of-1 trial and data analysis; (3) clinical use and advantages of the n-of-1 trial in conventional medicine; (4) potential clinical uses of the n-of-1 trial in CAM; (5) preliminary guidelines for the use of the n-of-1 trial in CAM; (6) constraints on the use of the n-of-1 trial in CAM; and (7) ethical issues in the conduct of the n-of-1 trial.

PMID:
15673992
DOI:
10.1089/acm.2004.10.979
[Indexed for MEDLINE]

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for Atypon
Loading ...
Support Center