Format

Send to

Choose Destination
See comment in PubMed Commons below
J Appl Psychol. 2005 Jan;90(1):94-107.

Effect size and power in assessing moderating effects of categorical variables using multiple regression: a 30-year review.

Author information

1
The Business School, University of Colorado at Denver, Denver, CO 80217, USA. herman.aguinis@cudenver.edu

Abstract

The authors conducted a 30-year review (1969-1998) of the size of moderating effects of categorical variables as assessed using multiple regression. The median observed effect size (f(2)) is only .002, but 72% of the moderator tests reviewed had power of .80 or greater to detect a targeted effect conventionally defined as small. Results suggest the need to minimize the influence of artifacts that produce a downward bias in the observed effect size and put into question the use of conventional definitions of moderating effect sizes. As long as an effect has a meaningful impact, the authors advise researchers to conduct a power analysis and plan future research designs on the basis of smaller and more realistic targeted effect sizes.

PMID:
15641892
DOI:
10.1037/0021-9010.90.1.94
[Indexed for MEDLINE]
PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

0 comments
How to join PubMed Commons

    Supplemental Content

    Full text links

    Icon for American Psychological Association
    Loading ...
    Support Center