Format

Send to

Choose Destination
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2004 Dec 15;29(24):2809-14.

Intervertebral disc replacement maintains cervical spine kinetics.

Author information

1
Orthopaedic Biomechanics Laboratory, San Francisco General Hospital, and the Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94110, USA. cputtlitz@orthosurg.ucsf.edu

Abstract

STUDY DESIGN:

An in vitro biomechanical study of C4-C5 intervertebral disc replacement using a cadaveric model.

OBJECTIVES:

To investigate the degree of motion afforded by a ball-and-socket cervical intervertebral disc prosthesis design.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA:

Intervertebral disc prostheses designs attempt to restore or maintain cervical disc motion after anterior cervical discectomy and reduce the likelihood of accelerated degeneration in adjacent discs by maintaining normal motion at the affected disc level. Surprisingly, the actual kinetic and biomechanical effects that cervical disc arthroplasty imparts on the spine have not been widely reported. Accordingly, we investigated what effect implanting a cervical disc prosthesis has on the range of motion at the affected level as well as how it changes the coupled motion patterns at the level of implantation.

METHODS:

Six fresh-frozen human cadaveric cervical spines (C2-C7) were used in this study. We evaluated two different spinal conditions: intact and after disc replacement at C4-C5. Compression (using the follower load concept) and pure moment loading were applied to the specimen. Range of motion was measured using an optical tracking system. Statistical differences between the intact and replaced condition range of motion was determined using analysis of variance with post hoc comparisons (alpha = 0.05).

RESULTS:

The data indicate that the intervertebral disc prosthesis approximated the intact motion in all three rotation planes at the affected level. Finally, changes in cervical coupled rotations, specifically lateral bending during axial rotation loading and axial rotation during lateral bending loading, were not statistically significant between the two tested conditions.

CONCLUSIONS:

Our data demonstrate that a ball-and-socket design can replicate physiologic motion at the affected and adjacent levels. More importantly, the data indicate that motion coupling, which is most dramatic in the cervical spine and plays an important biomechanical role, is maintained.

PMID:
15599283
[Indexed for MEDLINE]

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for Wolters Kluwer
Loading ...
Support Center