Study objective: At hospitals without detailed managerial accounting data but with overall longer than average diagnosis-related groups (DRG)-adjusted lengths of stays (LOS), some administrators do not aggressively hire the nurses needed to maintain surgical hospital capacity. The consequence of this (long-term) decision is that day-of-surgery admit cases are delayed or cancelled from a lack of beds. The anesthesiologists suffer financially. In this paper, we show how publicly released national LOS data can be applied specifically to these cases.
Design: We applied the method to 1 year of data from two academic hospitals. Each case's LOS was compared to the United States national average LOS for cases with the same DRG.
Measurements and main results: A total of 8,050 and 10,099 hospitalizations, respectively. Among all surgical admissions, mean LOS was 2.5 days longer than the national average for Hospital #1 (95% confidence interval [CI], 2.1 to 2.8) and 3.1 days longer for Hospital #2 (95% CI, 2.8 to 3.4). Among patients undergoing elective, scheduled surgery with day of surgery admission, mean LOS was 0.7 days less than average for Hospital #1 (0.6 to 0.9) and 1.2 days less than average for Hospital #2 (1.1 to 1.4).
Conclusions: This method can be used by anesthesiologists to show that LOS are not longer than average among patients whose surgeries may be cancelled or delayed for a lack of hospital ward staff.