Format

Send to

Choose Destination
Evolution. 2004 Oct;58(10):2319-31.

How much of the variation in adaptive divergence can be explained by gene flow? An evaluation using lake-stream stickleback pairs.

Author information

1
Redpath Museum and Department of Biology, McGill University, Montréal, Québec H3A 2K6, Canada. andrew.hendry@mcgill.ca

Abstract

How much of the variation in adaptive divergence can be explained by gene flow? The answer to this question should objectively reveal whether gene flow generally places a substantial constraint on evolutionary diversification. We studied multiple independent lake-stream population pairs of threespine stickleback (Gasterosteus aculeatus). For each pair, we quantified adaptive divergence based on morphological traits that have a genetic basis and are subject to divergent selection. We then estimated gene flow based on variation at five unlinked microsatellite loci. We found a consistent and significant pattern for morphological divergence to be positively correlated with genetic divergence and negatively correlated with gene flow. Statistical significance and the amount of variation explained varied within and among traits: 36.1-74.1% for body depth and 11.8-51.7% for gill raker number. Variation within each trait was the result of differences among methods for estimating genetic divergence and gene flow. Variation among traits likely reflects different strengths of divergent selection. We conclude that gene flow has a substantial effect on adaptive divergence in nature but that the magnitude of this effect varies among traits. An alternative explanation is that cause and effect are reversed: adaptive divergence is instead constraining gene flow. This effect seems relatively unimportant for our system because genetic divergence and gene flow were not correlated with ecologically relevant habitat features of lakes (surface area) or streams (width, depth, flow, canopy openness).

PMID:
15562693
[Indexed for MEDLINE]

Supplemental Content

Loading ...
Support Center