Format

Send to

Choose Destination
Sleep Breath. 2004 Sep;8(3):111-24.

Comparison of primary-care practitioners and sleep specialists in the treatment of obstructive sleep apnea.

Author information

1
Sleep Disorders Center, Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care, University of Maryland, Baltimore, Maryland 21209, USA. sscharf@medicine.umaryland.edu

Abstract

We wished to determine if being treated for sleep apnea by a sleep specialist increased patient awareness or long-term continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) compliance. We performed a retrospective telephone survey and laboratory chart review in patients with a diagnosis of sleep apnea evaluated either at a laboratory in which only sleep specialists can order polysomnography (University Specialty Hospital, noted as USH) or at a laboratory serving the medical community at large (Kernan Hospital, noted as K). Both laboratories are under the same medical director, use the same policies and procedures, equipment, and technician pool. One hundred three patients participated in the survey (approximately 37% of those contacted), 59 from USH and 44 from K. The groups were comparable in terms of demographics, presenting complaints, and apnea severity. In patients treated by sleep specialists, awareness of the disease process was greater and the evaluation was timelier than in patients treated by generalists. However, there was no difference between the groups' long-term self-reported CPAP acceptance or compliance. The most robust predictor of continued CPAP use was the patient's self-report of feeling better.

PMID:
15389385
DOI:
10.1007/s11325-004-0111-6
[Indexed for MEDLINE]

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for Springer
Loading ...
Support Center