Format

Send to

Choose Destination
J Orthod. 2004 Jun;31(2):107-14.

Extractions as a form of interception in the developing dentition: a randomized controlled trial.

Author information

1
Department of Dental Health and Biological Sciences, University of Wales, College of Medicine Heath Park, Cardiff CF14 4XY, Wales, UK. Kauc@cardiff.ac.uk

Abstract

OBJECTIVE:

To determine if the extractions of lower primary canines are an effective procedure to relieve crowding of the labial segment.

STUDY DESIGN:

randomized controlled trial. Subject sample: 83 cases were collected in clinics in Italy, Germany and Wales. The groups were followed over a 2-year period.

METHODS:

Subjects were randomly allocated to a primary canine non-extraction or extraction group. Dental casts of the patients were collected at the start and at the recall period of the trial. The outcome measures recorded were lower incisor crowding, arch length, intermolar width, overbite, overjet, lower clinical crown heights and lower incisor inclinations.

STATISTICS:

The Mann-Whitney test was used to compare the differences between the extraction and non-extraction groups.

RESULTS:

In both groups, crowding reduced 1.27 mm in the non-extraction group and 6.03 mm in the extraction group. The difference between the 2 groups was 4.76 mm (P<0.05). The arch perimeter decreased more in the extraction group by 2.73 mm (P<0.05). As the incisor inclination stayed essentially the same, the loss in arch length was attributed to the molars moving forward. The net gain from extracting deciduous canines was 2.03 mm.

CONCLUSIONS:

There was a reduction in lower incisor crowding as a result of lower primary canine extraction. However, arch perimeter decreased more in the extraction group leaving less space for the eruption of the lower secondary canines.

PMID:
15210926
DOI:
10.1179/146531204225020391
[Indexed for MEDLINE]

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for Taylor & Francis
Loading ...
Support Center