Send to

Choose Destination
J Med Microbiol. 2004 Jul;53(Pt 7):663-668. doi: 10.1099/jmm.0.45557-0.

Epidemiology of Burkholderia cepacia complex species recovered from cystic fibrosis patients: issues related to patient segregation.

Author information

Department of Bacteriology, Northern Ireland Public Health Laboratory1 and Northern Ireland Regional Adult Cystic Fibrosis Centre3, Belfast City Hospital, Belfast BT9 7AB, UK 2Cardiff School of Biosciences, Cardiff University, Cardiff CF1 3US, UK.


Studies of the prevalence of Burkholderia cepacia complex species amongst cystic fibrosis (CF) patients in different geographical regions, and the association between cross-infection and putative transmissibility markers, will further our understanding of these organisms and help to address infection-control issues. In this study, B. cepacia complex isolates from CF patients in different regions of Europe were analysed. Isolates were examined for B. cepacia complex species and putative transmissibility markers [cable pilin subunit gene (cblA) and the B. cepacia epidemic strain marker (BCESM)]. Sporadic and cross-infective strains were identified by random amplification of polymorphic DNA (RAPD). In total, 79% of patients were infected with Burkholderia cenocepacia (genomovar III), 18% with Burkholderia multivorans (genomovar II) and less than 5% of patients with B. cepacia (genomovar I), Burkholderia stabilis (genomovar IV) or Burkholderia vietnamiensis (genomovar V). The cblA and BCESM transmissibility markers were only detected in strains of B. cenocepacia. The BCESM was a more sensitive marker for transmissible B. cenocepacia strains than cblA, although sporadic B. cenocepacia strains containing the BCESM, but lacking cblA, were also observed. Furthermore, clusters of cross-infection with transmissibility marker-negative strains of B. multivorans were identified. In conclusion, B. cenocepacia was the greatest cause of cross-infection, and the most widely distributed B. cepacia complex species, within these CF populations. However, cross-infection was not exclusive to B. cenocepacia and cblA and the BCESM were not absolute markers for transmissible B. cenocepacia, or other B. cepacia complex strains. It is therefore suggested that CF centres cohort patients based on the presence or absence of B. cepacia complex infection and not on the basis of transmissibility marker-positive B. cenocepacia as previously suggested.

[Indexed for MEDLINE]

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for Ingenta plc
Loading ...
Support Center