Format

Send to

Choose Destination
Eur J Clin Nutr. 2004 Nov;58(11):1525-31.

Comparison of anthropometry to DXA: a new prediction equation for men.

Author information

1
Department of Nutritional Sciences, University of Missouri-Columbia, Columbia, MO, USA. ballsd@missouri.edu

Abstract

OBJECTIVE:

This study compared three professionally recommended anthropometric body composition prediction equations for men to dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA), and then developed an updated equation, DXA Criterion (DC) from DXA.

DESIGN:

Cross-sectional.

SETTING:

Exercise Physiology Lab. University of Missouri-Columbia, USA.

SUBJECTS:

A total of 160 men aged 18-62 y old.

INTERVENTIONS:

Percent body fat (%BF) by anthropometry was compared to DXA on the same day.

RESULTS:

Although %BF was significantly correlated (r=0.923-0.942) (P<0.01) with DXA for all three equations, each equation underestimated %BF (range=3.1-3.3%) (P<0.01) compared to DXA. The following DC equation for men was created: %BF=0.465+0.180(Sigma7SF)-0.0002406(Sigma7SF)(2)+0.06619(age); (Sigma7SF=sum of chest, midaxillary, triceps, subscapular, abdomen, suprailiac, thigh; age=years). The predicted residual sum of squares (PRESS) R(2) was high (0.90) and the PRESS standard error of estimates was excellent (2.2% at the mean) for the DC equation when applied to our sample of 160 men.

CONCLUSIONS:

The currently recommended anthropometric equations for men underestimate %BF compared to DXA. The DC equation yields a more accurate estimation of %BF in men aged 18-62 y old. The results from this study support the need for the current %BF standards and norms for men to be adjusted upward.

PMID:
15162135
DOI:
10.1038/sj.ejcn.1602003
[Indexed for MEDLINE]

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for Nature Publishing Group
Loading ...
Support Center