Format

Send to

Choose Destination
See comment in PubMed Commons below
Proc Biol Sci. 2004 Mar 22;271(1539):561-4.

The role of subspecies in obscuring avian biological diversity and misleading conservation policy.

Author information

1
Bell Museum, 100 Ecology Building, University of Minnesota, St Paul, MN 55108, USA. rzink@biosci.cbs.umn.edu

Abstract

Subspecies are often used in ways that require their evolutionary independence, for example as proxies for units of conservation. Mitochondrial DNA sequence data reveal that 97% of continentally distributed avian subspecies lack the population genetic structure indicative of a distinct evolutionary unit. Subspecies considered threatened or endangered, some of which have been targets of expensive restoration efforts, also generally lack genetic distinctiveness. Although sequence data show that species include 1.9 historically significant units on average, these units are not reflected by current subspecies nomenclature. Yet, it is these unnamed units and not named subspecies that should play a major role in guiding conservation efforts and in identifying biological diversity. Thus, a massive reorganization of classifications is required so that the lowest ranks, be they species or subspecies, reflect evolutionary diversity. Until such reorganization is accomplished, the subspecies rank will continue to hinder progress in taxonomy, evolutionary studies and especially conservation.

PMID:
15156912
PMCID:
PMC1691635
DOI:
10.1098/rspb.2003.2617
[Indexed for MEDLINE]
Free PMC Article
PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

0 comments
How to join PubMed Commons

    Supplemental Content

    Full text links

    Icon for HighWire Icon for PubMed Central
    Loading ...
    Support Center