Send to

Choose Destination
See comment in PubMed Commons below
Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2004 Jun;16(3):201-9.

The risk of birth defects in children born after assisted reproductive technologies.

Author information

  • 1National Perinatal Epidemiology Unit, University of Oxford, UK.



This review addresses the question of whether there is evidence of an increased risk of birth defects in children born following assisted reproductive technologies compared with spontaneously conceived children.


Three recent studies added relatively little new information given their modest size (56-472 assisted reproductive technology children). We therefore considered all published papers that compared birth defects in children born following assisted reproductive technologies with those in children born following spontaneous conception. Overall, only six of the 26 relevant papers concluded there was an increased risk of birth defects following assisted reproductive technologies. The interpretation of many studies was based on statistical significance testing alone. When results showed a greater proportion of defects in the assisted reproductive technology group compared with the spontaneous group, but the results were not statistically significant, this was often interpreted as showing no increase in risk, rather than an increase in risk that may have been due to chance. The vast majority of individual studies were too small to have sufficient power to detect, as statistically significant, clinically relevant results. We found that although only eight (30%) of the studies had statistically significant results, 24 (89%) had an odds ratio estimate comparing assisted reproductive technology with spontaneously conceived children of over 1.0; 19 (70%) had an estimate of 1.20 or greater; and 14 (52%) had an estimate of 1.5 or greater.


Current evidence suggests there is an elevated risk of birth defects in children born following assisted reproductive technologies. Whilst others may disagree with our interpretation, one certainly cannot exclude this possibility on the basis of the current evidence.

[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

How to join PubMed Commons

    Supplemental Content

    Full text links

    Icon for Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
    Loading ...
    Support Center