Format

Send to

Choose Destination
See comment in PubMed Commons below
Jt Comm J Qual Saf. 2004 Apr;30(4):195-204.

Improving care for the ventilated patient.

Author information

1
Departments of Anesthesiology/Critical Care Medicine, Surgery, and Health Policy & Management, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, USA. sberenho@jhmi.edu

Abstract

CONTEXT:

Despite evidence that the use of specific interventions can decrease morbidity and mortality for patients receiving mechanical ventilation, a gap exists between best evidence and practice. A prospective cohort study was conducted in a surgical intensive care unit (ICU) that included all patients who were mechanically ventilated. The study was designed to ensure that for 90% of ventilator days, patients receive processes associated with improved outcomes, including semirecumbent positioning, daily interruption of sedative-drug infusions, peptic ulcer disease prophylaxis, and deep venous thrombosis prophylaxis.

INTERVENTION:

The improvement model included three interventions: (1) administering a questionnaire to identify barriers to compliance with the four care processes, (2) implementing an educational intervention, and (3) implementing a checklist to be completed daily during ICU rounds to ask providers whether patients were receiving these therapies.

RESULTS:

Overall, 80% of nurses did not know there was evidence to support at least one of the four therapies. During the study period (March 4-April 29, 2002), the percentage of ventilator days on which patients received all four care processes increased from 30% to 96% (p < .001).

DISCUSSION:

Evidence-based therapies for mechanically ventilated patients can reduce morbidity, mortality, and costs of care.

PMID:
15085785
[Indexed for MEDLINE]
PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

0 comments
How to join PubMed Commons

    Supplemental Content

    Full text links

    Icon for Elsevier Science
    Loading ...
    Support Center