Format

Send to

Choose Destination
See comment in PubMed Commons below
J Med Virol. 2004 May;73(1):79-84.

Comparative evaluation of measles virus specific TaqMan PCR and conventional PCR using synthetic and natural RNA templates.

Author information

1
Division of Virology, National Institute for Biological Standards and Control, South Mimms, Potters Bar, Hertfordshire, UK.

Abstract

Comparative evaluation of TaqMan RT-polymerase chain reaction (PCR) methodology developed during this study with the conventional RT-PCR-nested PCR methodology developed earlier, using measles virus RNA templates derived from synthetic and natural sources against a number of primer sets belonging to various regions of the genome, revealed the existence of similar assay thresholds for both methods. An exception to this finding was, however, noted using primer sets of the N and M genes regions with RNA templates extracted from the wild type measles virus strain where the nested PCR method proved to be 10- to 100-fold more sensitive than the end points established with the N gene specific TaqMan RT-PCR method with synthetic RNA templates. These differences were not evident when the same primer sets were evaluated with RNA templates extracted from a brain sample of SSPE patient. These findings indicate that the genetic make up of measles virus strain in any given clinical specimen, in relation to the amplifying primers/probe sequences, can have impact on the overall sensitivity and specificity of the methodology applied. Both methods are equally suitable for the molecular detection of measles virus sequences in clinical specimens, although the TaqMan RT-PCR method may be preferred due to its advantages of contamination control, automation, and real-time product quantitation.

PMID:
15042652
DOI:
10.1002/jmv.20050
[Indexed for MEDLINE]
PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

0 comments
How to join PubMed Commons

    Supplemental Content

    Full text links

    Icon for Wiley
    Loading ...
    Support Center