Format

Send to

Choose Destination
See comment in PubMed Commons below
J Health Econ. 2004 Mar;23(2):237-58.

Valuing health care using willingness to pay: a comparison of the payment card and dichotomous choice methods.

Author information

1
Department of Public Health, Health Economics Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Foresterhill, Aberdeen AB25 9ZD, UK. m.ryan@abdn.ac.uk

Abstract

This paper compares willingness to pay (WTP) estimates generated from the dichotomous choice (DC) and payment card (PC) approaches. In a split-sample WTP experiment concerned with allocating scarce health care resources across three health care interventions, the DC approach is shown consistently to generate larger welfare estimates than the PC. Observed difference between PC and DC experiments cannot be explained by the inclusion of non-demanders or methods of statistical analysis but may be partly explained by "yea-saying". No evidence of range bias or mid-point bias was found with PC responses. Data were also collected on respondents' ordinal rankings of the three interventions and person-trade-offs (PTOs). Neither of these approaches converged with WTP. Future work must address the decision heuristics individuals employ when responding to valuation experiments.

PMID:
15019754
DOI:
10.1016/j.jhealeco.2003.09.003
[Indexed for MEDLINE]
PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

0 comments
How to join PubMed Commons

    Supplemental Content

    Full text links

    Icon for Elsevier Science
    Loading ...
    Support Center