Format

Send to

Choose Destination
See comment in PubMed Commons below
Clin Infect Dis. 2004 Feb 1;38(3):363-9. Epub 2004 Jan 13.

Short-course rifampin and pyrazinamide compared with isoniazid for latent tuberculosis infection: a cost-effectiveness analysis based on a multicenter clinical trial.

Author information

1
Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, San Francisco General Hospital Medical Center, CA 94110, USA. rjasmer@itsa.ucsf.edu

Abstract

Two months of treatment with rifampin-pyrazinamide (RZ) and 9 months of treatment with isoniazid are both recommended for treatment of latent tuberculosis infection in adults without human immunodeficiency virus infection, but the relative cost-effectiveness of these 2 treatments is unknown. We used a Markov model to conduct a cost-effectiveness analysis to assess the impact on life expectancy and costs based on the results of a recent clinical trial that compared the rates of adverse events and completion of the 2 treatment regimens. Compared with no treatment, both regimens increased life expectancy by 1.2 years, but RZ cost 273 dollars more per patient. Sensitivity analyses showed that, assuming equal efficacy between the 2 regimens, there was no threshold completion rate for RZ at which the 2 treatments would be of equal net cost. Under most circumstances, treatment of latent tuberculosis infection with isoniazid is cost-saving than treatment with RZ.

PMID:
14727206
DOI:
10.1086/380966
[Indexed for MEDLINE]
PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

0 comments
How to join PubMed Commons

    Supplemental Content

    Full text links

    Icon for Silverchair Information Systems
    Loading ...
    Support Center