Format

Send to

Choose Destination
See comment in PubMed Commons below
J Abnorm Psychol. 2003 Nov;112(4):614-22.

Group comparisons of DSM-IV subtypes of chronic depression: validity of the distinctions, part 2.

Author information

1
Department of Psychology, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA 23284-2018, USA. jmccull@mail2.vcu.edu

Abstract

The nosology of chronic depression in Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (4th ed.; DSM-IV, American Psychiatric Association, 1994) is highly complex and requires clinicians to differentiate among several chronic course subtypes. This study replicates an earlier investigation (J. McCullough et al., 2000; see record 2000-05424-007) that found few differences among Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (3rd ed. rev.; DSM-III-R; American Psychiatric Association, 1987) categories of chronic depression. In the present study, 681 outpatients with chronic major depression, double depression, recurrent major depression without full interepisode recovery, and chronic major depression superimposed on antecedent dysthymia were compared. Few differences were observed on a broad range of demographic, clinical, psychosocial, family history, and treatment response variables. The authors suggest that chronic depression should be viewed as a single, broad condition that can assume a variety of clinical course configurations.

PMID:
14674873
DOI:
10.1037/0021-843X.112.4.614
[Indexed for MEDLINE]
PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

0 comments
How to join PubMed Commons

    Supplemental Content

    Full text links

    Icon for American Psychological Association
    Loading ...
    Support Center