Format

Send to

Choose Destination
See comment in PubMed Commons below
J Med Ethics. 2003 Dec;29(6):359-63.

Should patient consent be required to write a do not resuscitate order?

Author information

1
Emergenvy Department, Sandringham Hospital, 193 Bluff Road, Sandringham, Victoria 3191, Australia. pbiegler@bigpond.net.au

Abstract

Consent ought to be required to withhold treatment that is in a patient's best interests to receive. Do not resuscitate (DNR) orders are examples of best interests assessments at the end of life. Such assessments represent value judgments that cannot be validly ascertained without patient input. If patient input results in that patient dissenting to the DNR order then individual physicians are not justified in overriding such dissent. To do so would give unjustifiable primacy to the values of the individual physician. Therefore patient consent is effectively required to write a DNR order. Patient dissent to a DNR order should trigger a fair process mechanism to resolve the dispute.

PMID:
14662816
PMCID:
PMC1733798
[Indexed for MEDLINE]
Free PMC Article
PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

0 comments
How to join PubMed Commons

    Supplemental Content

    Full text links

    Icon for PubMed Central
    Loading ...
    Support Center